BRIEFCASE | SEARCH | LOGIN    
RSNA 2004 > Unusual CT Features in Thoracic Sarcoidosis
 
Scientific Posters
  CODE: 2410CH-p
  SESSION: Chest (Parenchymal Lung Disease)
  Unusual CT Features in Thoracic Sarcoidosis

TOOLS
 
Add to Briefcase
  Print
  Email Event
PARTICIPANTS
Presenter
Pierre-Yves Brillet MD
Abstract Co-Author
Y Maulat
Y Nunes
D Valeyre
JL Dumas
M Brauner
- Author stated no financial disclosure

- Disclosure information unavailable
SUBSPECIALTY CONTENT
Chest Radiology
Computed Tomography
 
  DATE: Monday, November 29 2004
  START TIME: 12:45 PM
  END TIME: 12:55 PM
  LOCATION: Hall D1, Lakeside Center

 PURPOSE
 
Sarcoidosis is a multiorgan granulomatosis of unknown origin that involves thoracic sites in most cases. Our objective was to identify the unusual and potentially confusing thoracic CT features in this disease.
  
 METHOD AND MATERIALS
 
Thoracic high-resolution CT examinations of 965 consecutive patients who underwent CT in our center for confirmed thoracic sarcoidosis were reviewed. CT were evaluated by consensus of two radiologists. CT features were considered as unusual if observed in less than 5% of patients.
  
 RESULTS
 
209 patients (22%) had one or more unusual CT features. Unusual features were equally observed in women (n=98 patients) and men (n=111 patients), with a mean age of 47 years old (min/max: 16-78) and 37% of patients older than 50 years old. No difference between these patients and patients with typical features were observed for sex (p=0.14) and age>50 years old (p=0.12). Unusual features were observed more frequently in radiographic stage 2 (n=78;37%), and 4 (n=76; 36%). Unusual manifestations in lung parenchyma (17.5% of patients) included atypical features in the distribution or shape of nodules (n=25) and micronodules (n=20), cavitation other than mycotic (n=48), atelectasis or air trapping (n=24), bronchiectasis (n=15) and basal reticulation (n=11). Other unusual features were noted regarding lymph nodes (4.9% of patients), pleura (2.7% of patients), vascular compression (2.2% of patients).
  
 CONCLUSION
 
Unusual CT features are frequently noted in this large series with a wide spectrum of manifestations. Awareness of these atypical radiological features is essential for differential diagnosis.
  
Copyright © 2004 Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
820 Jorie Boulevard, Oak Brook, IL 60523-2251 || (630) 571-2670 || fax (630) 571-7837
U.S. and Canada: Main (800) 381-6660, Membership (877) RSNA-MEM (776-2636)
.13