BRIEFCASE | SEARCH | LOGIN    
RSNA 2004 > Productivity of Medical Imaging Equipment: A Global ...
 
Scientific Posters
  CODE: 0829HS-p
  SESSION: Health Services, Policy, and Research (Practice Management)
  Productivity of Medical Imaging Equipment: A Global Comparative Analysis

TOOLS
 
Add to Briefcase
  Print
  Email Event
PARTICIPANTS
Presenter
Anuj Tolia MD
Abstract Co-Author
Mark Schweitzer MD
Christian Zapf
- Author stated no financial disclosure

- Disclosure information unavailable
SUBSPECIALTY CONTENT
Health Policy / Management / Informatics
 
  DATE: Tuesday, November 30 2004
  START TIME: 12:15 PM
  END TIME: 12:25 PM
  LOCATION: Hall D1, Lakeside Center

 PURPOSE
 
To compare the intensity of imaging utilization globally. To evaluate the potential effect of wealth and population density on this utilization.
  
 METHOD AND MATERIALS
 
Data regarding the number of radiography, mammography, CT, MR, US and nuclear medicine units and procedures for 2001 was obtained from 14 nations in the North American (3), South American (1), Asian (4), and European (6) continents. Data was obtained from the databases of Frost & Sullivan. Data on GNI/capita, purchasing power parity (PPP) and population density (PD) was obtained from the World Bank 2002 and encyclopedia Wikipedia respectively.

Unit utilization was calculated for the 6 modalities by dividing the total exams by number of units. Unit utilization was divided by PD and PPP to determine relative utilization. Utilization was then divided by US data to create normalized ratios.
  
 RESULTS
 
Compared to the US, a higher number of exams/unit was performed in Europe (x-ray 1.8 +/- 0.4, mammo 3.7 +/- 4.5, CT 1.1 +/- 0.3, MR 1.7 +/- 0.5, US 1.8 +/- 0.9, NM 1.8 +/- 0.3) and a lower number in Asia (x-ray 1.0 +/- 0.1, mammo 0.1 +/- 0.1, CT 0.5 +/- 0.2, MR 0.3 +/- 0.2, US 0.4 +/- 0.2, NM 0.9 +/- 0.6). Excluding CT and NM, a higher number of exams/unit was also performed in Brazil and Mexico.

Standardizing for PD lowered relative utilization in Europe (x-ray 0.7 +/- 0.7, mammo 0.4 +/- 0.3, CT 0.4 +/- 0.3, MR 0.5 +/- 0.4, US 0.4 +/- 0.3, NM 0.6 +/- 0.5) and Asia (x-ray 0.1 +/- 0.1, mammo 0.02 +/- 0.03, CT 0.04 +/- 0.03, MR 0.03 +/- 0.04, US 0.05 +/- 0.05, NM 0.1 +/- 0.1). The UK served as an outlier with relative utilization paralleling the US.

Standardizing for PPP also lowered relative utilization in Europe (x-ray 0.5 +/- 0.2, mammo 0.4 +/-0.2, CT 0.3 +/- 0.2, MR 0.4 +/- 0.3, US 0.6 +/- 0.5, NM 0.5 +/- 0.5) and Asia (x-ray 2.2 +/- 2.6, mammo 0.1 +/- 0.2, CT 0.3 +/- 0.3, MR 0.3 +/- 0.3, US 0.5 +/- 0.5, NM 0.9 +/- 1.1). Relative utilization standardized by income in Brazil, Mexico and Canada was highest at 5-10 times greater than the US.
  
 CONCLUSION
 
The US ranks low among industrialized nations in imaging unit utilization. Analysis of utilization by national income and PD provides comparative global data on imaging unit productivity.
  
 DISCLOSURE
 
C.Z.: Siemens employee
  
Copyright © 2004 Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
820 Jorie Boulevard, Oak Brook, IL 60523-2251 || (630) 571-2670 || fax (630) 571-7837
U.S. and Canada: Main (800) 381-6660, Membership (877) RSNA-MEM (776-2636)
.13