BRIEFCASE | SEARCH | LOGIN    
RSNA 2004 > MR Imaging Reports of the Knee: Preferences of Orthopedic ...
 
Scientific Papers
  CODE: SSG23-01
  SESSION: Musculoskeletal (Knee: Internal Derangement)
  MR Imaging Reports of the Knee: Preferences of Orthopedic Surgeons—Survey of Members of the Arthroscopy Association of North America

TOOLS
 
Add to Briefcase
  Print
  Email Event
PARTICIPANTS
Presenter
Kay Lozano MD
Abstract Co-Author
Hsingyee Lee MD
Ronald Boucher
Amilcare Gentili MD
Donald Resnick MD
Robert Pedowitz MD
- Author stated no financial disclosure

- Disclosure information unavailable
  DATE: Tuesday, November 30 2004
  START TIME: 10:30 AM
  END TIME: 10:40 AM
  LOCATION: S405AB

 PURPOSE
 
A crucial component of a radiologist's job is to create reports that are clinically useful. As no specific guidelines exist regarding reports of knee MR examinations, our objective is to determine the preferences of orthopedic surgeons with regard to such reports.
  
 METHOD AND MATERIALS
 
We surveyed the Arthroscopy Association of North America. 135 members responded to our web-based survey. The survey consisted of 20 multiple choice questions. Three questions requested multiple answers, and three questions provided an option for comments.
  
 RESULTS
 
67% of the surveyed orthopedists always read knee MR reports provided by radiologists. 23% frequently reviewed knee MR reports to ensure findings correlated with the physical examination. 30% relied on their own image interpretation. 35% preferred reports to be organized by structures (bones, menisci, etc.). Most of the remaining orthopedists chose reports to be organized either by compartments or by abnormal vs. normal findings. 43% favored standard reports with findings and impression sections. 29% preferred the impression to precede the findings section. Cartilage abnormalities were the most frequent finding identified during arthroscopy but not described in the knee MR report. Almost all respondents found description of the type of meniscal tear to be essential. 43% believed that their radiologists were not aware of their preferences in knee MR reports. 20% were unsure whether their radiologists were aware of their preferences. 69% reported they contacted the interpreting radiologists regarding discrepancies between knee arthroscopy and MR reports. 70% reported that their radiologists did not routinely review arthroscopy reports to identify discrepancies. The surveyed orthopedists emphasized the variability of interpretation by different radiologists.
  
 CONCLUSIONS
 
Orthopedic surgeons have specific expectations with regard to knee MR reports. Most preferred a standard report format. The most frequent arthroscopic findings not reflected in knee MR reports were cartilage abnormalities. Results of this study indicate that radiologists are often unaware of the knee MR reporting preferences of their referring orthopedic surgeons.
  
Copyright © 2004 Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
820 Jorie Boulevard, Oak Brook, IL 60523-2251 || (630) 571-2670 || fax (630) 571-7837
U.S. and Canada: Main (800) 381-6660, Membership (877) RSNA-MEM (776-2636)
.13